I didn't put color xxx
in my .vimrc
. So I see this when I first open my .vimrc
.
Then I type :color darcula
. And it changes to this.
:color
gives me darcula
here (naturally).
Then I type :set background=dark
. And it changes to this.
:color
gives me default
here (amazingly).
So my question is, what exactly does :set background=dark
do?
I tried :h background
and didn't find anything helpful. I understand that this command doesn't actually change the background, only vim will change colors accordingly. But I still want to ask this question. Because I'm really happy with the color after :color darcula
and :set background=dark
so I wonder how to write my own color scheme without having to put set background=dark
in my .vimrc
.
I took advice from @statox and put set background=dark
at the last line of my darcula.vim
. Then color darcula
gives me the third screenshot. However when I put it at the first line, color darcula
gives me the second screenshot. Also set bg=dark
changes it to the third screenshot.
I assumed by putting it at the first line, I'm telling vim that this colorscheme is designed for a dark background. By putting it at the last line, on the contrast, I let vim assume that this colorscheme is designed for a light background and then make vim change some of it by itself (when it processes the last line).
If what I assume happened is true, my question is still unanswered. What exactly did vim change, when I use set bg=dark
AFTER it has loaded a light colorscheme?
My entire vim configuration is available at https://github.com/MichaelMa2014/.vim